Four engagements selected for their complexity and the specificity of the embedded support role. Different program types, consistent thread: structured governance, clear reporting, and disciplined execution against real delivery timelines.
Greenfield SAP S/4HANA implementation spanning four value chain workstreams — Procure to Pay, Order to Cash, Record to Analyse, and Hire to Retire — across global shared services teams. A complex multi-workstream program requiring PMO infrastructure built and sustained across a live go-live schedule.
PMO governance infrastructure required significant strengthening — reporting existed but lacked standardisation, with late submissions and unstructured status updates masking real issues. Watermelon reporting was present. UAT planning was ambiguous across five workstreams with no agreed entry or exit criteria, creating material go/no-go decision risk. AI tooling adopted sporadically with no usage standards. Program Manager bandwidth was at capacity, requiring proxy coverage across stakeholder meetings, communications, and lower-level reviews.
Iterated PMO governance infrastructure end-to-end: handbook, reporting standards, value stream maps for report creation and submission, cost allocation processes, and report style guides that stopped late and unstructured submissions. Designed UAT entry and exit criteria across all five workstreams — repositioning the process as a strategic business and technology interface, covering functional and non-functional requirements and business process readiness. Proxied Program Manager across communications, steering reviews, and stakeholder management. Developed AI usage guidelines for Copilot and Microsoft 365 to lift output quality and consistency.
First-wave lift-and-shift of corporate functions to shared services centres in Kuala Lumpur and Manila. The program was the organisation's first attempt at shared services centralisation at scale — no existing blueprint, no PMO infrastructure, and a constrained timeline with full delivery accountability.
No governance structure, reporting architecture, or workstream tracking existed at program commencement. Everything required building from zero in parallel with active program delivery. Stakeholder complexity spanned multiple geographies, functions, and seniority levels, each with competing priorities. Leadership required comprehensive visibility throughout, with no tolerance for reporting ambiguity.
Built the full PMO infrastructure from inception: governance framework, reporting architecture, workstream tracking, risk and issue management, and stakeholder communication structures — all established while the program was running. Maintained rigorous reporting discipline and structured escalation pathways throughout the delivery cycle, ensuring leadership had accurate program visibility at all times.
Independent diagnostic review of procurement and supply chain operations across a national private hospital network. Engaged to assess process maturity, system capability, and organisational structure — and to provide an objective view that internal teams were too close to the problem to produce.
Required credible engagement across a complex, multi-site organisation with competing operational priorities and limited existing governance. Stakeholders ranged from operational managers to executive leadership, each with different views of the problem. The diagnostic had to surface root causes — not symptoms — and land with sufficient credibility to drive executive decision-making.
Conducted a structured diagnostic across the procurement and supply chain function, assessing process maturity, system capability gaps, and organisational design. Applied rigorous prioritisation and decision-making frameworks to distil findings into a concise, executive-ready set of recommendations — sequenced by impact and implementability.
Subcontracted to a Tier 1 global consultancy to lead procurement coaching and capability development across a global manufacturing business. The engagement operated on a client-led delivery model — coaching category teams to develop and execute their own strategies, rather than delivering consultant-led recommendations. Wave 1 carried a hard savings target with full accountability.
The client-led model required building team capability under delivery pressure — simultaneously developing interpersonal effectiveness and technical procurement skills in practitioners who had not previously operated at this level. Getting people to actually do things differently, and sustain that under commercial pressure, was the central challenge. Savings targets were non-negotiable.
Led structured coaching and facilitation across category teams — developing both the technical skills required for category management and the interpersonal and communication effectiveness needed to execute under pressure. Applied disciplined prioritisation and decision-making support throughout Wave 1, maintaining pace and accountability against delivery milestones. Written and verbal communication coaching embedded directly into working sessions.
References available on request. Most engagements begin through a direct referral. If you were sent here by someone, that is the right starting point for a conversation.
Book a Conversation →